Certifikace rezidenčních budov František Macholda, EkoWATT
Proč certifikace v rezidenčním sektoru? Co je k dispozici? Porovnání možností
Proč certifikace rezidenčních budov
Co je dnes výhoda? U metra Škola Zeleň Parkování Výhled Cena
Co je dnes výhoda? U metra Škola Zeleň Parkování Výhled Cena 2018 nzeb
Nearly Zero Energy Building? Budova s velmi nízkou potřebou energie významnou měrou pokrytou obnovitelnými zdroji
Nearly Zero Energy Building? Anglické přísloví: Nemůžeš současně koláč jíst a mít. České přísloví: Aby se vlk nažral a koza zůstala celá.
Česká téměř nulová budova? Uem o 30 % lepší Primární energie o 20 % nižší A referenční budova není nic moc
Řešení? Certifikace! LEED BREEAM SBTool DGNB IgCC CALGreenCode Energy Star Green Globes Living Building Challenge Pasivhaus WELL BCA BPI BEAM CASBEE EDGE GREEN Star Pearl Rating HQE Minergie OMG! WTF?
Co je / může být k dispozici v ČR?
Co lze aplikovat? Pasivní dům SBToolCZ BREEAM LEED
Pasivní dům Požadavky: Celková dodaná energie Neobnovitelná energie Průměrný součinitel prostupu tepla Tepelná stabilita (Ne)průvzdušnost Větrání se ZZT
Pasivní dům PHI - Passivhaus Institut: Výpočet podle PHPP Reálné místní klimatické podmínky Certifikát Nová Zelená Úsporám: Výpočet podle TNI Normalizované klimatické podmínky PENB
Pasivní dům NZÚ jednodušší: Odlišná vztažná plocha Normalizované podmínky Hranice 20 / 15 Dotace!
Pasivní dům Dotace NZÚ: 1300 Kč/m 2 vztažné plochy Mimo Prahy Nemusí být pasivní, stačí nzeb Strop de minimis - 200 tis. EUR / 3 roky
Pasivní dům PHI: Certifikát autorizovaného pasivního projektanta
Lokální nástroj pro komplexní environmentální certifikaci Vývoj FsV ČVUT Certifikační autorita: VÚPS, TAZUS
39 kritérií Vliv na ŽP - 50 % Sociální - 35 % Ekonomika a management - 15 % Lokalita - 0 %
10 9 nejlepší kvalita budovy c e l k o v é b o d o v é s k ó r e 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 vysoká kvalita budovy standardní kvalita budovy dobrá kvalita budovy
Certifikace: Důraz na návrh, ve fázi výstavby se pouze stvrzuje soulad s PD
Hotové certifikace: 4 lokality, 20 certifikátů (19 v období 2010-12, 1 v roce 2012)
BREEAM International New Construction d e r i Eco-Homes p Ex d e r Codexfor pi Sustainable Homes (CSH) E y l n o HomeKQuality Mark (HQM) U
BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Univerzální schéma certifikace
This performance is quantified by a number of individual measures an environmental issues, see Table 1, which is ultimately expressed as a s describes how a BREEAM rating is calculated). BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Table 1 BREEAM International New Construction 2016 environmenta Management Project brief and design Life cycle cost and service life planning Responsible construction practices Commissioning and handover Aftercare. Energy Health and Visua Indoo Safe c Therm Acou Acce Haza Privat Wate Transport
Aftercare. BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Energy Reduction of energy use and carbon emissions Energy monitoring External lighting Low carbon design Energy efficient cold storage Energy efficient transport systems Energy efficient laboratory systems Energy efficient equipment Drying space. Water Acous Access Hazard Private Water Transport Public Proxim Altern Maxim Travel Materials
Low carbon design Energy efficient cold storage Energy efficient transport systems Energy efficient laboratory systems efficient equipment BREEAMEnergy International New Construction 2016 Drying space. Water Materials Water consumption Water monitoring Water leak detection Water efficient equipment. Waste Trave Life c Hard Resp Insula Desig Mate Land use an
Water consumption Water monitoring Water leak detection Water efficient equipment. BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Waste 6 Life cy Hard Respo Insula Desig Mate Land use an Construction waste management Site se Recycled aggregates Ecolo Operational waste featu Speculative floor and ceiling finishes Minim Adaptation to climate change Enhan Technical Manual: Version: SD233 I Functional adaptability. Long Pollution Impact of refrigerants Innovation Innov
Construction waste management Recycled aggregates Operational waste Speculative floor and ceiling finishes BREEAM Adaptation International New Construction to climate change Functional adaptability. Pollution Impact of refrigerants NOx emissions Surface water run-off Reduction of night time light pollution Reduction of noise pollution. 2016 Site selec Ecologic features Minimisi Enhancin Long ter Innovation Innovatio
EEAM Assessor and the BRE Global certification process, to measure, evaluate and uilding against best practice in an independent and robust manner. mber of individual measures and associated criteria stretching across a range of ch is ultimately expressed as a single certified BREEAM rating, i.e. the label (section 3 ulated). BREEAM International New Construction 2016 nstruction 2016 environmental sections and assessment issues planning ctices r Health and wellbeing Visual comfort Indoor air quality Safe containment in laboratories Thermal comfort Acoustic performance Accessibility Hazards Private space Water quality. Transport
tion practices andover use and carbon Safe containment in laboratories Thermal comfort Acoustic performance Accessibility Hazards Private space BREEAMWater International New Construction quality. Transport Public transport accessibility Proximity to amenities Alternative modes of transport Maximum car parking capacity Travel plan. torage port systems atory systems ment Materials Life cycle impacts Hard landscaping and boundary protection 2016
torage port systems atory systems ment ment. Proximity to amenities Alternative modes of transport Maximum car parking capacity Travel plan. BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Materials Life cycle impacts Hard landscaping and boundary protection Responsible sourcing of materials Insulation Designing for durability and resilience Material efficiency. Land use and ecology
Materials Life cycle impacts Hard landscaping and boundary protection Responsible sourcing of materials BREEAM International New Construction Insulation Designing for durability and resilience Material efficiency. Land use and ecology ement Introduction Site selection Ecological value of site and protection of ecological features finishes Minimising impact on existing site ecology ge Enhancing site ecology chnical Manual: Version: SD233 Issue: 1.0 Issue Date: 21/03/2016 Long term impact on biodiversity. Innovation Innovation. 2016
nagement eiling finishes change light pollution ution. Introduction Site selection Ecological value of site and protection of ecological features BREEAM International New Construction Minimising impact on existing site ecology Enhancing site ecology Long term impact on biodiversity. Innovation Innovation. 2016
The environmental section weightings Table4.3 BREEAM rating benchmarks 5. The BREEAM assessment issues and credits 6. How these elements combine to produce BREEAM Rating % scorea BREEAM rating for a project is summarised on th followed by a description and example describing the methodology for calculating a rating. 7. The BREEAM rating benchmarks for projects assessed using the BREEAM International New C OUTSTANDING 85 are as follows: BREEAM International Table 3 BREEAM rating benchmarksnew Construction 2016 EXCELLENT BREEAM Rating VERY GOOD OUTSTANDING GOOD EXCELLENT PASS VERY GOOD UNCLASSIFIED GOOD 70 % score 55 85 45 70 30 55 < 30 45 PASS rating benchmarks enable a client 30 and all other stakeholders to compare the perfor The BREEAM other BREEAM rated buildings of the same type, and the typical sustainability performance of a s UNCLASSIFIED < 30 In this respect each BREEAM rating broadly represents performance equivalent to: 1. Outstanding: Less than the top 1% of buildings (innovator) The BREEAM rating benchmarks enable a client and all other stakeholders to compare the perform 2. Excellent: Top 10% of buildings (best practice) other BREEAM rated buildings of the same type, and the typical sustainability performance of a sto 3. Very Good: Top 25% of buildings (advanced good practice) 4.In this Good: Top each 50%BREEAM of buildings good performance practice) respect rating(intermediate broadly represents equivalent to: 5. Pass: Top 75% of buildings (standard good practice) 1. Outstanding: Less than the top 1% of buildings (innovator)
2. The BREEAM Assessor will then determine for each of BREEAM's nine environmental sections (as applicable) the number of 'credits' awarded. This must be determined by the BREEAM Assessor in accordance with the criteria of each assessment issue (as detailed in the technical sections of this document). 3. The percentage of 'credits' achieved is then calculated for each section. 4. The percentage of 'credits' achieved in each section is then multiplied by the corresponding section weighting. This gives the overall environmental section score. 5. The section scores are then added together to give the overall BREEAM score. 6. The overall score is then compared to the BREEAM rating benchmark levels and, provided all minimum standards have been met, the relevant BREEAM rating is achieved. 7. An additional 1% can be added to the final BREEAM score for each 'innovation credit' achieved (up to a maximum of 10% and with the total BREEAM score capped at 100%). BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Table 6 : Example BREEAM score and rating calculation BREEAM section Credits achieved Credits available % of Credits achieved Section weighting (fully fitted) Section score Management 10 20 50.00% 0.12 6.00% Health and wellbeing 17 21 80.95% 0.14 11.33% Hazards 1 1 100.00% 0.01 1.00% Energy 16 34 47.05% 0.19 8.94% Transport 5 11 45.45% 0.08 3.63% Water 5 9 55.56% 0.06 3.33% Materials 10 14 71.43% 0.125 8.92% Waste 3 13 23.07% 0.075 1.73% Calculating a building's BREEAM rating Land use and 5 ecology 5 100.00% 0.10 BREEAM section Pollution Credits 5 achieved Credits 7 available % of Credits 71.42% achieved Section weighting (fully 0.065 fitted) Section 4.64% score Surface water run-off 4 5 80.00% 0.035 2.80% Innovation 2 10 20.00% 0.10 2.00% 28 Final BREEAM score BREEAM Rating Scoring and rating 10.00% Technical Manual: Version: SD233 Issue: 1.0 Issue Date: 21/03/2016 64.32% VERY GOOD
BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Projektový tým BREEAM AP BREEAM Assessor BRE
BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Výhody: univerzální známý Nevýhody: nákladný složitý byrokratický
LEED for Building Design and Construction v4 LEED Homes v4 Homes Low - Rise Mid - Rise
LEED BD+C v4
LEED BD+C v4
LEED BD+C v4
LEED BD+C v4
LEED BD+C v4
LEED BD+C v4
LEED BD+C v4
LEED BD+C v4 Projektový tým GBCI LEED AP USGBC
LEED BD+C v4 Výhody: praktický známý Nevýhody: nákladný složitý některé kredity jsou pro BD nedostupné
LEED for Homes v4 Homes - rodinné domy Low - Rise - 1-3 NP Mid - Rise - 4-8 (10) NP
LEED for Homes v4
LEED for Homes v4
LEED for Homes v4
LEED for Homes v4
LEED for Homes v4
LEED for Homes v4 Projektový tým Green Rater Homes Provider GBCI LEED AP Energy Rater USGBC
LEED BD+C v4 cca 150 dokumentů LEED for Homes v4 cca 25 dokumentů
LEED for Homes v4 Výhody: jednoduchý relativně levný praktický vysoké skóre Nevýhody: přicházející schéma účast Providera zpočátku zvýšené náklady
Shrnutí
Shrnutí Certifikace - konkurenční výhoda Pasivní standard - ano SBToolCZ - komplikovaný, není poptávka BREEAM - pouze velký, nákladné a komplikované LEED - velký LEED nákladný a náročný, některé kredity nedostupné LEED Mid-Rise - přicházející schéma, zatím zvýšené náklady, ale v budoucnu nejlevnější a nejpraktičtější
Díky za pozornost! Mgr. František Macholda, MBA Energetický specialista LEED Accredited Professional (BD+C, EB:O+M) BREEAM International Assessor, BREEAM In Use Auditor SBToolCZ konzultant frantisek.macholda@ekowatt.cz www.ekowatt.cz