Rail Network Development

Transkript

1 Rail Network Development Jiří HRUBOŇ KORID LK (CZ) This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF This project is supported by the German Federal Transnational Cooperation programme

2 Location of the Liberec region Germany

3 Characteristics of the Liberec region (1) The second smallest region in the Czech Republic (out of 13) The capital of the Liberec Region is the fifth biggest city in the Czech Republic The high rate of unemployment, especially in the peripheral parts of the region (forces residents to commute to work outside their hometowns) The demand for public transport rises

4 Characteristics of the Liberec region (2) Lacks connection to other crucial railway corridors The only regional capital in the country which lacks a good quality railway connection with Prague The regional railway tracks are run through a hilly, sometimes even mountainous terrain The regional railways suffer from longterm underinvestment Outdated infrastructure contrasts with the increasing quality of rolling stocks Decrease in the railway s competitiveness with other means of transport

5 Passenger rail transport stakeholders in the Liberec region Coordinator Passenger rail authorities are: The Liberec Region (regional trains) The Ministry of transport (long-distance trains express trains) KORID LK - coordinator of public transport in the Liberec Region (not only trains, but also buses, city transport) Transport providers Railway infrastructure manager Ministry of transport X X Infrastructure manager X X The Liberec Region Transport providers The Liberec Region doesn t have any contract with the infrastructure manager

6 Liberec The goals of the KORID pilot project Increase in the competitiveness of the railway in relation to other means of transport Retaining the passengers in the system especially in routine journeys to school and work Development of the railway network in harmony with current trends, needs and limits

7 Methods Analysis of the current situation Preparation of the transport concept Setting conditions for realization of the concept Sorting according to priorities and establishing a plan for each railway line Analysis Concept Conditions Priorities Output: Strategy for dealing with management of the Liberec Region, Ministry of transport, the infrastructure manager and other partners The crucial precondition for success to avoid wasting energy fighting over individual solutions is a consensus of opinion of all main parties

8 Findings (1) Establishing necessary investments according to the offered services and benefits Lines with low potential tender calls for the lowest price, (low cost, basic quality) Lines with a middle potential better use of existing possibilities, the proposal of spot improvements and organizational changes Lines with a high potential a major modernisation mostly in a new track Line Potential Investments Liberec - Česká Lípa Low 6 M Liberec Tanvald Middle 40 M Liberec - Mladá Boleslav (Praha) High 586 M We now have data for dealing with investors

9 Findings (2) Some needs demand greatly lower costs than expected - much can be achieved by organizational changes, modifications of the transport concept (timetable), spot modernisations of intersection points The example of the Liberec Česká Lípa line

10 Findings (3) Some needs demand significant investment cost. It is necessary to have project planning in advance to block a new route in regional plans and to prepare projects for grant applications The example of the Liberec Praha line

11 X:27/(X:57 L:29 S:30 S:29/L:20 L:30/S:40 S:33/L:37 L:32/S:20 uzel v 30 X:26/(X:56) X:30/(X:00) Vesec Jablonec n. N. Smržovka S:20/(L:20 info@interregiorail.eu Transferability to other passenger rail authorities Passenger rail authorities have to know about their needs on the long-term horizon The costs and benefits of the proposed measures have to be quantified Šluknov Mikulášovice d.n Rumburk směr Jelenia Góra - Wroclaw Rybniště Zittau S:25 S:36 bez nároků L:38/(S:38) uzel v S:3Szklarska Poreba Górna S:22/(L:22) uzel 00 směr Cottbus vždy přestup S:28 S:24 Železniční doprava severovýchodní Čechy S:10/(L:10) Chrastava S:56 L:58 30 bez nároků Jedlová směr Hrádek n. N. Harrachov 30 Mníšek bez nároků L:50/(S:50) směr FrýdlantS:57/(L:57) L:53/(S:53) 20 Děčín hl.n. 7 Markvartice Svor Rynoltice špatná návaznost 22 8 Benešov n.p. Česká Lípa hl.n. pražských R na trať do Harrachova v Tanvaldě bez nároků S:20/L:22 L:37/S:37 Liberec X:24 X:29 Kunčice n.l. Trutnov hl.n. Teplice n.m. S:12/L:20 L:58/L:03 L:58/L:03 L:37/S:33 příj. L:22 L:35/S:31 X:30 příj. L:25 X:19/(X:49) X:30/(X:00) Tanvald uzel v X:30 L:42/S:36 L:56/S:52 L:58/S:53 S:19/L:21 S:14 L:40 X:27 X:31 S:03/S:32 L:56/L:26 L:13/S:32 S:47/L:27 S:33 L:22 Františkov n. Žizníkov S:29 L:26 X:41 X:17 Hodkovice n.m. 42 Ústí n.l. Blíževedl Bezděz Mnich. UL Západ 16 - S:39 S:40/L:16 L:20/S:43 L:41/S:58 S:18/L: Koordinovat trasy Os v úseku Děčín - Benešov n. P. a Jedlová - odj. S:27 S:22/L:24 X:26 odj. S:30 X:34/(X:04) X:25/(X:55) bez nároků - S:00/S:42 V České Lípě vazba L:58 L:42 Železný Brod Dvůr L:39/S:11 L:59/L:18 S:01 S:17 1 Mimoň-Doksy jen Os. příj. L:25 bez nároků Stará Paka Jaroměř Starkoč Náchod 58 Bakov n.j. L: Turnov L:16/S:36 L:00/S:18 S:58/S:16 S:34/L:47 S:33/(L:46) L:45/(S:49) Lovosice V Turnově chybí S:20/L:09 odj. S:30 S:43/L:22 S:59/L:40 L:02/L:43 L:26/S:13 L:27/(S:14) S:15/(L:10) S:46 systémová vazba S:45 L:15 S:16 L:44 L:16 S:44 55 pražských R směr Jičín a Liberec (lze Os/R) 3 Košťálov Horka u (Os/Os 0 58 Kuks!) Příliš ostrá přestupní vazba Hrubá Skála Turnov - Česká Ml.Boleslav město L:35 S:24 Jičín 57 0 Ostroměř S:29 L:31 L:29 S:31 Hradce Králové hl.n. Lípa v Mladé Boleslavi příj. L:40 příj. L:23 X:21 X: Nové Město M.B. - Praha: při hodinovém rychlém segmentu problematický průvoz mladoboleslavských Os v úseku Všetaty - Ml.Boleslav hl.n odj. S:15 směr Dolní Bousov Chotětov L:32 S:27 odj. S:37 X:37 X: Bartoušov 0 57 Všetaty S:02 X: X:58/(X:44) X:02/(X:18) Lysá n. L Zhoršení X:00 /X:14 X:59/X:49 konektivity pro 13 návazné tratě v Kralupy n.vlt. Neratovicích. X:06 /X:21 X:54/X:42 43 X:34/(X:00 L:40/(S:40 Nevhodné dojezdové časy směr Turnov v Jičíně. Nymburk hl.n Chlumec n.c. Týniště L:57 X: X:02 X: L:58 S:00 Velké Hněvčeves - při stávající časové poloze hradeckých R jen obtížně řešitelná vazba M. Boleslav - Hradec Králové v Nymburce -koordinovat trasy R v úseku Nymburk - Velký Osek - jiné návaznosti v uzlu Kolín Trať 040: precizace modelu a potřeba zkrácení jízdních dob s ohledem na technologii a návaznosti v uzlových stanicích. S:32 L:29 L:32 S:29 Neratovice S:20 L:39 Kolín S:49 L:12 L:49 S:12 Pardubice hl.n. Choceň L: X:08/X:22 X:53/X:41 Měšice Praha: X:47 X:09 The pilot project provides a strategy for the successful targeting of all activities > model output

12 Thank you for your attention Contact Jiří HRUBOŇ